logo
  • Articles
  • Comments
  • Popular
Recent Articles
  • God Does Not Exist...
  • Keep It Real, Don’t Fake It...
  • Patterns of Grace; The Desert Fathers; Meditation ...
  • About Seeing with The Eyes of The Spirit of God:...
Recent Comments
  • dami: is incest good or bad?...
  • Gail Nobles: Hi NitaRenfrow. I have had visions ...
  • jeff: Personal responsibility I completel...
  • papaleng: well-researched and well presented ...
Popular Articles
  • The Advent Wreath a Symbol of Life and Hope
  • Prayer
  • It Scared Me
  • Christmas is Only for Christians
  • Are You Going to Hell?
  • Turn Aside and Listen: Its Time to Act
  • Should Atheists Celebrate Christmas?
  • The Joy of Childhood
  • A Lifestyle of Giving
  • Zoroastrianism: An Ancient Religion Explained
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise With Us
  • Submit An Article

Home » Christianity » An Alternative Interpretation of the Book of Revelation

An Alternative Interpretation of the Book of Revelation

There is more than one interpretation of the last book of the Bible. What was John the Divine really writing about?

Tags: antichrist, apocalypse, Christianity, interpretations, revelation
icon1 Published by Bruce W. Harden in Christianity on January 18, 2009 | one response

The Book of Revelation was written by a man called John, who would later become known as John the Divine.  Because of his Christian faith, John was exiled to the island of Patmos, a Roman penal colony.  The Revelation, also known as the Apocalypse, is one of the hardest books of the Bible to understand because it abounds in unfamiliar and extravagant symbolism.  This book is said to contain an account of visions.  Couched in symbolic and allegorical language, it borrows from the books of Ezekiel, Zechariah and Daniel.

The usual interpretation of Revelation, especially popularized  in the Left Behind books, goes something like this.  Satan comes to Earth in human form as the Antichrist and sets forth to take over the world.  A seven-headed beast comes from the sea.  One of the heads has ten horns which represent the reconstituted Holy Roman Empire.  Apocalyptic writers like Lindsey, La Haye and Jenkins, claim that this Empire is actually the European Community. 

Read more in Christianity
« Sunday Shopping
Moneywalk 436: Patience and Sound Judgment Create Blessings »

The Antichrist takes over the EU as a step toward establishing a world government.  The “Whore of Babylon” is a new world religion that replaces the other faiths.  The story ends with a final battle between the forces of Jesus and the forces of Satan.  By the way, the word Antichrist only appears a couple of times in the Bible while “rapture” does not appear at all.  The Rapture comes from a series of visions had by a teenage girl in Europe a few hundred years ago.

The above interpretation is embraced by most Protestants and some Catholics. However, there is another view that many Catholics believe: The book of Revelation was a veiled account of life in the first century A.D.  In this interpretation, the Antichrist was the emperor Nero.  The beast from the sea was the Roman Empire with the seven heads representing the emperors Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Vespasian and Titus.  The ten horns are vassal rulers, sometimes called kings, under the supremacy of Rome.

The Whore of Babylon symbolizes pagan Rome.  Here, John was writing about the ruthless persecution of early Christians by the Roman authorities.

I am not telling you that this is THE interpretation of the book of Revelation.  I am only saying that there is more than one way of looking at the Apocalypse.  Jesus is still going to return and the world as we know it is still going to end.  It just may not happen the way most people think it is.  Perhaps we should re-examine the Apocalyptic books of the Old Testament – Ezekiel and Daniel. 

0
Liked it
I Like It

One Response to “An Alternative Interpretation of the Book of Revelation”

  1. Saul Carter says:
    March 22, 2009 at 5:15 pm

    I agree that the Book of the Revelation is misinterpreted by some large degree. After over a year of studying it, I’ve found that the Left Behind crowd are not only wrong, but 100% wrong on all counts. The Revelation certainly needs a clear interpretation, but I fear that that is not forthcoming from the mainstream church. I’ve found in my many conversations with other that a serious dialogue on the cryptic book isn’t even wanted. The Revelation has become a touchstone for wild theorizing and irresponsible conspiracy theorists. I am very afraid for the souls of those who’ve not harkened the warnings of Revelation 22:18-19.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Search

Related Video

Categories

  • Buddhism
  • Christianity
  • Hinduism
  • Islam
  • Judaism
  • Paganism
  • Religion

Popular Tags

    advice atheism Beauty belief Bible child children Christ Christian Christianity christians Church cross Death faith Family gender-neutral God Grace Heaven holy spirit Hope Islam Jesus Jesus Christ joy life Lord Love money Peace prayer Religion Religion and Spirituality revelation Salvation scripture sexuality sin spirit spiritual spirituality Truth Yahweh Yeshua
Powered by
© 2009 Copyright Stanza Ltd., All Rights Reserved.