-
Fact one: “only guy on guy sex is mentioned, nowhere in the bible are lesbians mentioned”
-
Nowhere is transsexualism ever mentioned. the time where it says “do not cross-dress” in the bible it is talking about worshiping the fertility god.
1. “Adam and eve not Adam and Steve…” Really? makes me wonder that if Adam and eve were both Jewish, than whites and blacks cannot have sex. the same statement can induce racism, not a good sign. maybe god only loved the Jewish/Hebrew people? So this statement of Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve , or Adam and Eve not Madam and Eve is flowed at best, and should not even be in use again the Homosexual community.
2. “Sodom and Gomorrah” Sodomy in today’s time actually means butt rape, not butt sex. A few things I would ask is 1. tell me a single place in the bible that states Sodom was destroyed because of gay sex. and 2. tell me, if you can, why Sodom was going to be destroyed BEFORE the people tried to rape the angels? These two questions bring the whole story into question. It is also so refutable that no reasonable person actually uses it anymore.
3. Leviticus. In Leviticus you would believe it says “two men cannot have sex” and that is the end-all statement. But the HISTORY behind that verse is… guy-to-guy sex was induced as a practice to pagan gods, it has been historically proven that this happened at about the same time frame where Leviticus was created.
4. Romans. Romans does not say anything about guy-to-guy sex as any more than part of a punishment god plagued down on a nation who did not listen to him, also, he forced them to do it against their will “and therefore god gave them hearts over to…”. also, at the end of Romans where they are mentioning a LARGE list of vices, male sexual practices are not included. Why would Homosexual sex be completely secluded from the actual list of vices? It seems more like he forced them to have a huge orgy among themselves than a actual man on man sexual relationship. Even so this verse can be reversed on many Christians to say that these verses are also forbidding anything that is not strictly missionary position in a girl for strict sexual release or procreative purposes. As they said “changed natural… for unnatural…” and condoms do seem unnatural.
5. Arsenokoitai. This is a big most mistranslated word in the bible. in fact, the only thing we have to know what it means is based off of a few times it is mentioned outside of the bible, outside of a vague list. and what “arsen” and “koitai” mean. together, it means “male-bedder”. that is all we know of that. it is mentioned possibly 13 times or so outside of the bible. none of these times, however, is it ever mentioned to mean gay sex. Or anything close to related to homosexual sexual relationships.
6. In NONE of the forbidden or lost books of the bible is gay sex, or anything close to gay sex ever mentioned.
Here is a few things that I believe says god DOES accept gays in heaven.
-
“For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, so that whomever believes in him shall never die but have eternal life.”
-
I am sure when god says “love your neighbor as yourself” he is not talking about only the heterosexual ones.
-
“He who is without sin, may he cast the first stone” this has me believe that only the people who are able to judge, are the people without sin. namely, Jesus.
the Bible is ONLY a book.. the rest of the world does not have to follow it as though it was a law..
it has been changed and rechanged, and wasnt even written in verses to start with.
Being gay is natural.. people need to relax.
Natural? Tell that to nature. The biological imperative, whether it be animal, plant or microbial, is to reproduce. Nature has allowed some life forms to be asexual, but others can only reproduce in the male-female form. That is natural. Perhaps it is natural, but only if nature, or God if you wish to try to put a biblical spin on it, wishes to limit the population of the species.