Published by God created the heavens and the earth and the universe just as the Bible says, but one thing that people actually don’t’ know is that there’s actually more scientific evidence supporting this than any other theory that has ever existed or that exists now. Plus all other theories don’t fully answer the question concerning our existence. With any other theory we’re left asking what there was before those occurrences. For example, we’d have to ask what happened before evolution, or the big bang, and then what happened before that continuously. It’s only logical to believe in a creator who’s always existed.
When we look at the universe it is very complex, yet even scientists agree that it rests upon certain scientific laws. That is how scientists have been able to accurately predict the existence of certain elements on the periodic table even before they were found and that is also how they can study our solar system and many other aspects of it, because it’s precision stays intact. Just as we have learned that the earth stays a perfect distance away from the sun because of scientific laws. But a law we know is a pre-conceived notion, no law ever just appears right, an intelligent being creates it.
So even in thinking about this simple fact we can see that these laws reflect intelligence. No Big Bang could have set such finely tuned laws in motion, especially not ones that are so precise as to be predictable as were the missing elements on the periodic table. Neither could this sort of precision arise form nowhere.
It is estimated that the chances of forming even a simple protein molecule at random in an organic soup would be one in 10^113 or one in 10 followed by 113 zeros, which even mathematicians dismiss, considering anything with chances above 10^50 as impossible. And that’s just the slim chances of a protein molecule forming at random! So imagine how much smaller the chances are for the whole universe forming at random, or earth, or me, or you!
Thus scientific laws must not have formed at random and if factual scientific laws are not random, how much moreso could these laws not spring from nowhere. Even seemingly chaotic activities in the universe really reflect order when you consider the fact that they create orderly chances for new beginnings. For example: stars explode and the particles that they release lends to new amazing creations.
So the universe has laws (that is preconceived notions) and since they are not random (nor issuing from nothing) someone intelligent must have created them.
Additionally, without even delving too deeply into the topic of other theories involving our origins, we can quickly see them unravel and fall apart rapidly under even remote scrutiny. Besides the fact that, as I mentioned earlier, they still leave us asking questions concerning what happened before there origins continuously, they are not satisfactory immediate answers either. For example, take evolution, in even a short view under the investigative microscope, it fails.
In sum there are a few major things that immediately undermine evolution. 1) If evolution is about survival of the fittest and positive mutations, then why did the inferior apes that we supposedly evolved from survive? 2) Why did Darwin believe that discovering variety within a species’ kind proved evolution, when he actually only proved just that (or the opposite of evolution), that there is room for great diversity within a species.
Scientifically the law of biological inheritance loathes the idea of mutations, with them (mutations) only producing negative or disastrous results closer to 100% of the time (such as cancers and deformities). That is even why if a person should develop a scar, the body tries as hard as possible to maintain that previous continuity, so that, depending on the severity of the scar (the body can only do so much) the scar will usually fade more and more, attempting to disappear and become what it once was, that is regular unmarked skin.
While one species never transforms into another, there is great variety within a species as we can see with dogs. Tons of dogs have different shaped heads while still being dogs, and they can range in size from awkwardly small and long, like a dachshund, to huge German shepherds and even new forms of dogs are formed all the time, like labra-doodles (a lab and a poodle), but they are still dogs. And finally, why are the fossils of so called evolutionary species either non-existent, fabricated, or examples that are later discovered to be of beings who had suffered from disease or deformities?
But some may ask, ‘If all this is true why don’t more people believe in creation and why would an intelligent being allow so much chaos and suffering on the earth?’ Which is why many discerning people find it hard to believe in a brilliant creator greater than themselves. But only someone close minded could believe that all there is are the things that appear to the mere eye.
Even scientists have factually proved that there are even things that only animals discern which aren’t discernible to humans, such as a dogs incredible sense of smell, or a birds incredible eye sight, which as of late has also been newly discovered that they even see different colored patterns (attracting them certain mates) that we can’t see.
There are even other things that we know exist that are amazing that we believe in that we can’t see either at all or at least with our unaided eye that we believe in, such as the wind or radioactive waves. So why do we not believe that there are other things unseen? Because there are. It’s actually the answer to why an intelligent creator would allow suffering. Because there are things unseen that are happening in this world that are bigger than us.
We have to open our eyes to this. We must believe it. Because just as with the unseen wind, though we cannot see these things, we can feel them. If you have ever been in love could you not feel that it came from a powerful and amazing place, something bigger than yourself, something greater than a cold philosophical idea that it (love) only exist as an evolutionary byproduct to keep people reproducing and surviving. These cold concepts hurt society and foster harsh unloving people who under esteem love. We can see it in the rise of divorce and global child exploitation nurtured by mankind’s new relationship with mass and instant globalization provided by the internet.
These then emotionally damaged and unstable children will then only inevitably produce a generation of damaged and unstable adults, as some already have.
That is unless we stop looking to ourselves for the answer, because none of us are perfect, but a creator who is brilliant enough to create something as complex as a protein molecule and someone as beautiful as me or you is greater than our imperfect standards and far more intelligent.
And if all of us listened instead of just interpreting it for ourselves to suit our needs we wouldn’t have people who harmed others or events such as with the crusades or other horrible atrocities that have occurred because of selfish interpretations of life’s’ standards. We could find the answers. We could live at our fullest potential. We could know the true meaning of both love, peace and happiness.
